On 25.10.2014 6:21, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 24.10.2014 23:55, John Baldwin wrote: >> Author: jhb >> Date: Fri Oct 24 19:55:49 2014 >> New Revision: 273601 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/273601 >> >> Log: >> Don't reference sem(4) from the POSIX semaphore pages. POSIX semaphores >> were reimplemented using umtx in FreeBSD 9 and no longer use sem(4). > > sem kernel module referenced in sem(4) uses the same uipc_sem.c file as > kernel's P1003_1B_SEMAPHORES option, so they both use the same code and > better be cross-linked since sem(4) explains how to turn it on. >
>From the first glance I can't determine, is libc implementation better than kernel one or not. BTW, firefox port still recommends sem_load="YES" -- http://ache.vniz.net/ _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
