On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:03 PM, NGie Cooper <yaneurab...@gmail.com> wrote: > This change seems like it introduces a lot of unnecessary complexity > in lieu of someone setting PORTSDIR to the root of their ports tree in > the environment.
Sure, but people that are trying to use it somewhere other than /usr/ports shouldn't be surprised by misbehavior. I've worked with several people (who aren't steeped in the usage of ports) who were astonished by this behavior. > Why isn't it using a for-loop by the way? My original implementation used a shell for loop (see the CR), but given the lack of a legitimate use case for looking farther up than three parent directories, it seemed easier not to. I suppose one could use a static list of paths in the for loop though. --Will. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
