On Jul 8, 2014, at 1:09 AM, Julian Elischer <jul...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 7/8/14, 7:21 AM, Warner Losh wrote: >> Author: imp >> Date: Mon Jul 7 23:21:20 2014 >> New Revision: 268376 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268376 >> >> Log: >> rm -rf can fail sometimes with an error from fts_read. Make it honor >> fflag to ignore fts_read errors, but stop deleting from that directory >> because no further progress can be made. >> When building a kernel with a high -j value on a high core count >> machine, during the cleanobj phase we can wind up doing multiple rm >> -rf at the same time for modules that have subdirectories. This >> exposed this race (sometimes) as fts_read can return an error if the >> directory is removed by another rm -rf. Since the intent of the -f >> flag was to ignore errors, even if this was a bug in fts_read, we >> should ignore the error like we've been instructed to do. > One could make an argument that being unable to delete something because > someone else deleted it first is a "non error". > Even without -f rm is supposed to return an error when you try to delete something that isn’t there. Do you have a standards quote handy? Warner
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail