Author: dchagin
Date: Wed May 28 05:57:35 2014
New Revision: 266782
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/266782

Log:
  In r218101 I have not changed properly the futex syscall definition.
  Some Linux futex ops atomically verifies that the futex address uaddr
  (uval) contains the value val. Comparing signed uval and unsigned val
  may lead to an unexpected result, mostly to a deadlock.
  
  So copyin uaddr to an unsigned int to compare the parameters correctly.
  
  While here change ktr records to print parameters in more readable format.
  
  Tested by     eadler@
  
  MFC after:    3 days

Modified:
  head/sys/compat/linux/linux_futex.c

Modified: head/sys/compat/linux/linux_futex.c
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/compat/linux/linux_futex.c Wed May 28 03:10:16 2014        
(r266781)
+++ head/sys/compat/linux/linux_futex.c Wed May 28 05:57:35 2014        
(r266782)
@@ -679,12 +679,12 @@ futex_atomic_op(struct thread *td, int e
 int
 linux_sys_futex(struct thread *td, struct linux_sys_futex_args *args)
 {
-       int clockrt, nrwake, op_ret, ret, val;
+       int clockrt, nrwake, op_ret, ret;
        struct linux_emuldata *em;
        struct waiting_proc *wp;
        struct futex *f, *f2;
        int error;
-       uint32_t flags;
+       uint32_t flags, val;
 
        LIN_SDT_PROBE2(futex, linux_sys_futex, entry, td, args);
 
@@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ linux_sys_futex(struct thread *td, struc
        case LINUX_FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET:
                LIN_SDT_PROBE3(futex, linux_sys_futex, debug_wait, args->uaddr,
                    args->val, args->val3);
-               LINUX_CTR3(sys_futex, "WAIT uaddr %p val %d val3 %d",
+               LINUX_CTR3(sys_futex, "WAIT uaddr %p val 0x%x bitset 0x%x",
                    args->uaddr, args->val, args->val3);
 
                error = futex_get(args->uaddr, &wp, &f,
@@ -746,9 +746,9 @@ linux_sys_futex(struct thread *td, struc
                        LIN_SDT_PROBE4(futex, linux_sys_futex,
                            debug_wait_value_neq, args->uaddr, args->val, val,
                            args->val3);
-                       LINUX_CTR4(sys_futex,
-                           "WAIT uaddr %p val %d != uval %d val3 %d",
-                           args->uaddr, args->val, val, args->val3);
+                       LINUX_CTR3(sys_futex,
+                           "WAIT uaddr %p val 0x%x != uval 0x%x",
+                           args->uaddr, args->val, val);
                        futex_put(f, wp);
 
                        LIN_SDT_PROBE1(futex, linux_sys_futex, return,
@@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ linux_sys_futex(struct thread *td, struc
        case LINUX_FUTEX_WAKE_BITSET:
                LIN_SDT_PROBE3(futex, linux_sys_futex, debug_wake, args->uaddr,
                    args->val, args->val3);
-               LINUX_CTR3(sys_futex, "WAKE uaddr %p val % d val3 %d",
+               LINUX_CTR3(sys_futex, "WAKE uaddr %p nrwake 0x%x bitset 0x%x",
                    args->uaddr, args->val, args->val3);
 
                error = futex_get(args->uaddr, NULL, &f,
@@ -791,9 +791,9 @@ linux_sys_futex(struct thread *td, struc
                    args->uaddr, args->val, args->val3, args->uaddr2,
                    args->timeout);
                LINUX_CTR5(sys_futex, "CMP_REQUEUE uaddr %p "
-                   "val %d val3 %d uaddr2 %p val2 %d",
+                   "nrwake 0x%x uval 0x%x uaddr2 %p nrequeue 0x%x",
                    args->uaddr, args->val, args->val3, args->uaddr2,
-                   (int)(unsigned long)args->timeout);
+                   args->timeout);
 
                /*
                 * Linux allows this, we would not, it is an incorrect
@@ -842,7 +842,7 @@ linux_sys_futex(struct thread *td, struc
                if (val != args->val3) {
                        LIN_SDT_PROBE2(futex, linux_sys_futex,
                            debug_cmp_requeue_value_neq, args->val, val);
-                       LINUX_CTR2(sys_futex, "CMP_REQUEUE val %d != uval %d",
+                       LINUX_CTR2(sys_futex, "CMP_REQUEUE val 0x%x != uval 
0x%x",
                            args->val, val);
                        futex_put(f2, NULL);
                        futex_put(f, NULL);
@@ -861,9 +861,9 @@ linux_sys_futex(struct thread *td, struc
                LIN_SDT_PROBE5(futex, linux_sys_futex, debug_wake_op,
                    args->uaddr, args->op, args->val, args->uaddr2, args->val3);
                LINUX_CTR5(sys_futex, "WAKE_OP "
-                   "uaddr %p op %d val %x uaddr2 %p val3 %x",
-                   args->uaddr, args->op, args->val,
-                   args->uaddr2, args->val3);
+                   "uaddr %p nrwake 0x%x uaddr2 %p op 0x%x nrwake2 0x%x",
+                   args->uaddr, args->val, args->uaddr2, args->val3,
+                   args->timeout);
 
                error = futex_get(args->uaddr, NULL, &f, flags);
                if (error) {
@@ -886,6 +886,9 @@ linux_sys_futex(struct thread *td, struc
                 */
                op_ret = futex_atomic_op(td, args->val3, args->uaddr2);
 
+               LINUX_CTR2(sys_futex, "WAKE_OP atomic_op uaddr %p ret 0x%x",
+                   args->uaddr, op_ret);
+
                if (op_ret < 0) {
                        /* XXX: We don't handle the EFAULT yet. */
                        if (op_ret != -EFAULT) {
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to