On Mon, 26 May 2014 16:31:21 -0600 Warner Losh wrote: > On May 26, 2014, at 4:18 PM, Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> On Mon, 26 May 2014 09:53:57 -0600 Warner Losh wrote: >>> On May 26, 2014, at 8:39 AM, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhiteh...@freebsd.org> >>> wrote: >>>> On 05/26/14 02:35, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >>>>> I suppose you could replace the "x86" in the pkg scheme with i386/amd64, >>>>> but then you'd still be talking about i386:32, amd64:32 and amd64:64 >>>>> instead of x86:32, x86:x32 and x86:64. >>> >>> I suppose you could replace these by “i386”, “x32” (or “amd64x32”) and >>> “amd64” respectively. >> >> So you're on an amd64 or mips64 system (as indicated by uname) but you >> want to use the 32-bit package if possible. How does your script know >> about the magic "x32", "amd64x32" or "mipsn32" strings? Wouldn't it be >> easier if you could just use "`uname -p`:32”? > > Oh give me a break. You know it because you know you are building for > mipsn32 because that’s what you’ve set MACHINE_ARCH or TARGET_ARCH to,
No, MACHINE_ARCH or TARGET_ARCH is "amd64" or "mips64". You are building the 64-bit OS and then decide separately per package whether you want the ILP32 one or the LP64 one. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
