On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 14:30 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, April 09, 2014 1:45:04 pm Sean Bruno wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 11:47 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 5:39:52 pm Sean Bruno wrote: > > > > Author: sbruno > > > > Date: Tue Apr 8 21:39:51 2014 > > > > New Revision: 264280 > > > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/264280 > > > > > > > > Log: > > > > Actually, since this is what I thought I was doing, only allow the > > > > binmisc code to be build on amd64/i386 for the kernel. > > > > > > > > Update NOTES with some indication of what this code is used for. > > > > > > > > Pointed out by jhb@ ... thanks! > > > > > > > > Submitted by: jhb@ > > > > > > > > Modified: > > > > head/sys/conf/NOTES > > > > head/sys/conf/options.amd64 > > > > head/sys/conf/options.i386 > > > > head/sys/modules/Makefile > > > > > > Why not enable it on all platforms? I don't see anything inherently > > > MD about it. > > > > > > > > > This is purely an artifact of my comfort level with the code and the > > cases that I am using/testing. > > > > If someone can verify that it works on other architectures, I'm more > > than happy to enable on all platforms. > > Does it build on other platforms? I think it is better to enable it if > it builds to avoid bitrot. >
Untested. I agree that its better, I just haven't done it. I think this was a protective measure on my part to not inflict more work upon myself as I was already slight agitated at how long it took to get to the point of getting mips32 support implemented via qemu. sean
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
