On 1/22/14, 8:34 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 22 Jan 2014, at 20:05, Adrian Chadd <adrian.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
.. Make it be an offset into the table rather than a pointer, then we can do
dirty rcu style hacks to just replace and grow the table as we need more memory.
Don't we have a standard way to pull memory from the top of the physmem area
early on for allocations like this?
Perhaps a bit overkill for this problem?
Probably.. I keep thinking we should just increase the size by 2x but
allow platforms to override. for "SMALL".
-Alfred
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
