On Dec 7, 2013, at 2:04 PM, Tom Rhodes <trho...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 01:44:19 -0500 > Eitan Adler <ead...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Xin LI <delp...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> Author: delphij >>> Date: Sat Dec 7 06:27:54 2013 >>> New Revision: 259058 >>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/259058 >>> >>> Log: >>> Remove mention of the compatibility option 'q', which is >>> intentionally undocumented and its only purpose is that >>> we do not bail out when used as a drop-in replacement of >>> a different implementation. >> >> As I mentioned in the reply to the PR this change goes in the wrong >> direction. >> >> We should instead document -q as a compatibility option. >> Undocumented flags, even as NOPS, are bugs. > > It should be documented as a do-nothing option.
It should be documented in the manpage as a do-nothing option. It should not be included in Usage. Tim _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
