On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Andriy Gapon <a...@freebsd.org> wrote: > on 10/09/2013 15:03 Davide Italiano said the following: >> The Illumos cv_timedwait_hires() doesn't use 'res' argument so if you >> want to be consistent with their behaviour you should pass '0' as >> precision argument to cv_timedwait_sbt(). > > As far as I can see, illumos does use the resolution. > > -- > Andriy Gapon
Hmm, it looks like I was looking at the wrong version of cv_timedwait_sbt() (the one in lib/libzpool/common/kernel.c), thanks for noticing. That said, I'm not still sure there's an 1:1 mapping between our precision concept and their (but I might be wrong here), and I think gethrestime is not suitable for the amount of precision required. -- Davide "There are no solved problems; there are only problems that are more or less solved" -- Henri Poincare _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
