On 7 September 2013 14:29, Slawa Olhovchenkov <s...@zxy.spb.ru> wrote:
> > I think we can aim to get this stuff snuck into -HEAD after 10 branches > > off. Sneaking it into -HEAD now would be way too risky. We can always MFC > > it later on to hit 10.1 or something. > > I think now -HEAD can't be more risky by one or two patches. Hah, the ol' "it's already broken, we can't possibly make it worse" argument. :-) It's ultimately up to re@ at this point, but personally I think adding a last minute patch to loader primarily for a feature that we'd also have to rush in as well is too risky. A lot has changed in -HEAD over the last few weeks and in my opinion we should let the dust settle and get people using the latest -HEAD before trying out even more new stuff. We can always back-port it to -10 (and -9 if people want) later on in the year. -adrian _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
