On Jul 10, 2013, at 11:09 AM, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 2:05:43 pm John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:42:20 pm Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>>> Author: marcel
>>> Date: Wed Jul 10 17:42:20 2013
>>> New Revision: 253161
>>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/253161
>>> 
>>> Log:
>>>  Protect against broken hardware. In this particular case, protect against
>>>  H/W not de-asserting the interrupt at all. On x86, and because of the
>>>  following conditions, this results in a hard hang with interrupts disabled:
>>>  1.  The uart(4) driver uses a spin lock to protect against concurrent
>>>      access to the H/W. Spin locks disable and restore interrupts.
>>>  2.  Restoring the interrupt on x86 always writes the flags register. Even
>>>      if we're restoring the interrupt from disabled to disabled.
>>>  3.  The x86 CPU has a short window in which interrupts are enabled when the
>>>      flags register is written.
>> 
>> Do you have proof of this?

No. I only have proof of a hard hang during auto configuration that
cannot be fixed in any other way than not to setup the interrupt at
all.

-- 
Marcel Moolenaar
mar...@xcllnt.net


_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to