On Sunday, April 28, 2013 8:06:16 pm hiren panchasara wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:46 AM, hiren panchasara <hi...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Eitan Adler <ead...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> On 23 April 2013 12:19, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >>> ... you know, even though it doesn't have an active maintainer, do you > >>> have test hardware, and why didn't you just bounce a patch to > >>> -wireless for review? > > > > My bad. I proposed this change initially. > >>> > >>> We don't bite you know! > >> > >> that you need to emphasize this does not comfort me. ;) > >> > >> reverted in 249812. > > > > Will look at john's suggestions and fix it correctly. > > John, > > Does this look okay? > > % svn diff > Index: if_bwn.c > =================================================================== > --- if_bwn.c (revision 250036) > +++ if_bwn.c (working copy) > @@ -9240,9 +9240,9 @@ > BUS_DMASYNC_PREWRITE); > > /* > - * Setup RX buf descriptor > + * Restore RX buf descriptor > */ > - dr->setdesc(dr, desc, paddr, meta->mt_m->m_len - > + dr->setdesc(dr, desc, meta->mt_paddr, meta->mt_m->m_len - > sizeof(*hdr), 0, 0, 0); > return (error); > }
I would leave the comment alone. In the common case you do allocate a new mbuf so you aren't restoring the descriptor but setting it up with a new address. The code change looks correct. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
