On Saturday, March 16, 2013 12:54:01 pm Rui Paulo wrote: > On 2013/03/13, at 8:08, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 5:09:21 pm Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:18:45PM +0000, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > >>> Author: ken > >>> Date: Mon Mar 4 21:18:45 2013 > >>> New Revision: 247814 > >>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/247814 > >>> > >>> Log: > >>> Re-enable CTL in GENERIC on i386 and amd64, but turn on the CTL disable > >>> tunable by default. > >>> > >>> This will allow GENERIC configurations to boot on small memory boxes, but > >>> not require end users who want to use CTL to recompile their kernel. > >>> They > >>> can simply set kern.cam.ctl.disable=0 in loader.conf. > >> > >> Could you rename it to kern.cam.ctl.enable(d)? There was discussion at > >> some point about sysctl/tunable names and the consensus was, AFAIR, to > >> use positive(?) names as they are more obvious. > > > > Except that all the hints we use for devices are hint.foo.X.disable=1 :) > > > I think this is not correct. The `disabled' hint comes from > resource_disabled(), which checks for > "resource_int_value(name, unit, "disabled", &value);"
Yes, it probably is disabled rather than disable, but the point about it being a negative "disable" hint vs a positive "enable" hint still stands. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
