On Saturday, December 15, 2012 1:04:17 am Bruce Evans wrote: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > On 12/14/12 4:12 PM, Robert Watson wrote: > >> On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, John Baldwin wrote: > >> > >>> On Thursday, December 13, 2012 4:02:15 am Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > >>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 04:53:48PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: A> The > >>>> problem again is that not all the KASSERTS are inviolable, if you A> > >>>> want > >>>> to do a project to split them, then please do, it would really be A> > >>>> helpful, as for now, they are a mis-mash of death/warnings and there are > >>>> A> at least three vendors who approve of this as well as 3 long term A> > >>>> committers that approved my change (not including Adrian). > >>>> > >>>> Can you show examples of not inviolable KASSERTs? > >>> > >>> There are none. They are all assertions for a reason. However, in my > > Not even one whose existence is a bug? :-)
They should just not exist at all then. :) All the more reason for them to panic early and often so developers will be prompted to remove them. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
