on 16/12/2012 10:06 Alfred Perlstein said the following: > On 12/15/12 11:45 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 16/12/2012 07:00 Ian Lepore said the following: >>> Some developer already made that choice by coding a >>> KASSERT() instead of a panic().
>> Please don't perpetuate this argument. The point of KASSERT is not that the >> developer intended that the system should try to keep running in production. >> The point is that (1) the KASSERT should not be hit in production as was >> established in testing *and* (2) having all KASSERTs enabled in production is >> too expensive. That's all. >> > I don't understand, we have a few partners running KASSERT enabled kernels. > > Depending on workload our machines can have enough CPU free for this. Yes, sure. I have stated the reason why KASSERT is controlled by INVARIANTS. I haven't said that it must turned off in production. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
