on 13/12/2012 09:16 Adrian Chadd said the following: > Hi, > > I think the fundamental problem here is we have some pretty different > ideas of what KASSERT should be, versus what it actually is in various > parts of the code.
Oh, and another part of the problem is that the discussion is opinion based. But it didn't have to be. Compare this: We think that feature F is a very good idea, we think that it will be used by many people and it will provide a lot of benefits. So here you are - the code is in the tree. To this: We have been using feature F, it has proved to be a very good idea as it provided these benefits and spared us from these problems. So here you are - the code is in the tree. If I have a differing opinion in the first case I usually state it (and can be pulled into an argument about it). If I have a different opinion in the second case, I try to adjust my opinion to the stated reality. > Since we're lost in semantics, we're not going to get any further on > this discussion just for now, so let's take a break and think about > other things for now. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
