On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 06:12:55PM +0000, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Author: avg > Date: Sat Dec 1 18:12:55 2012 > New Revision: 243762 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/243762 > > Log: > gfs_file_inactive: replace bad code with ugly code > > Also, make it explicit that V_XATTRDIR is not properly supported in gfs > code yet. > > The bad code was plain incorrect: (a) it spoiled handling of v_usecount > reaching zero and (b) it leaked v_holdcnt. > > The ugly code employs potentially unsafe locking tricks. > > Ideally we should separate vnode lifecycle and gfs node lifecycle. > A gfs node should have its own reference count where its child nodes > should be accounted.
Very good you are touching this:) If you verify if it works, you should try .zfs/ directory when it is visible and not visible through local file system and through NFS. All those cases have their own bugs in the past. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com FreeBSD committer http://www.FreeBSD.org Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://tupytaj.pl
pgpJ2Bmj4oaoS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
