On 29 November 2012 15:57, Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com> wrote:
> IMO, such changes shall not be done, and the already accumulated nonsense > needs to be reverted. It causes no harm, and helps reduce the number of false positives in the clang static analyzer code so I fail to see why this should be reverted. This isn't akin to a comment as it changes the behavior of at least one helpful tool. Any future change which changed the return behavior of the function would cause an error (due to -Werror) and then the attribute could be changed. -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
