On 15 October 2012 16:10, Eitan Adler <ead...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 15 October 2012 18:45, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> Why not sleep for the amonut of time needed before the next event?
>
> If the crontab changes in the meantime. If the next event is in a week,
> but you modify the crontab, you don't want to sleep until next event.

Right. So "check the crontab file" event is also an event with a
timestamp in the future.

Maybe crontab should be using a command via a socket to reload, rather
than stat'ing files..


Adrian


> Why we stat the file every quantum instead of using something kqueue is
> a different question.
>
>
> --
> Eitan Adler
> Source & Ports committer
> X11, Bugmeister, Ports Security teams
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to