On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Gleb Smirnoff <gleb...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 01:31:03AM +0000, Kevin Lo wrote: > K> Author: kevlo > K> Date: Fri Oct 12 01:31:02 2012 > K> New Revision: 241471 > K> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/241471 > K> > K> Log: > K> Since the moduledata structure member priv is a void pointer, using > K> NULL instead of 0 when dealing with pointers. > K> > K> Modified: > K> head/share/man/man9/module.9 > K> > K> Modified: head/share/man/man9/module.9 > K> > ============================================================================== > K> --- head/share/man/man9/module.9 Thu Oct 11 23:41:18 2012 > (r241470) > K> +++ head/share/man/man9/module.9 Fri Oct 12 01:31:02 2012 > (r241471) > K> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static int foo_handler(module_t mod, int > K> static moduledata_t mod_data= { > K> "foo", > K> foo_handler, > K> - 0 > K> + NULL > K> }; > K> > K> MODULE_VERSION(foo, 1); > > I think we should provide C99 sparse initializers for structures in > all manpages in section 9, as well as use only such initializers in any new > code added to tree.
For man pages and .c files, that'd be fine. But since it's still possible to build C++ kernel modules, header files can't do this since named initializers don't have the same syntax in C++ (unless they fixed this in C++11?) Thanks, matthew _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
