On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:37:37PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Were these changes discussed somewhere and I missed it?
They were not discussed. I did not see the need. This is simple functionality. If securelevel is raised > 0, one cannot start up a firewall nor make major changes to time. Thus these components are required to be done before raising securelevel. > I'm not opposed per se, but the security aspects should be discussed on > freebsd-security@, I'm sorry, I didn't feel that ensuring the software follows the published specification of its functionality to have such a security aspect. > and it's preferable that significant changes to > rcorder be looked at on freebsd-rc@ as well. I don't consider this to be a significant change. I do have some significant changes that I do want freebsd-rc@ to review I will be sending soon. > Can you hold off on MFC'ing any of this until it's been reviewed more > thoroughly? Yes. -- -- David (obr...@freebsd.org) _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
