Right, that code got left in lem when i split it off from em by mistake, just cleaning that up.
Will commit this then. Jack On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:09 AM, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 1:46:59 pm Jack Vogel wrote: > > No, like so: > > This looks good to me. The 82574 is supported by em(4) and not lem(4) it > seems, hence removing that? > > -- > John Baldwin > _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
