On 05/11/12 13:08, Warner Losh wrote: > On May 11, 2012, at 9:02 AM, Colin Percival wrote: >> On 05/11/12 05:48, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >>> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:37:16PM +0000, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >>>> +bool byte_sort = false; + +static wchar_t **wmonths = NULL; +static >>>> unsigned char **cmonths = NULL; >>> >>> Such initializations are useless. You only increase the size of the binary >>> on the disk as the consequence. >> >> I just tested this hypothesis, and found no change in binary size using >> either clang or gcc46. Presumably they're smart enough to ignore explicit >> (and unnecessary) initializations of statics to zero. > > How did you test this? size(1) or ls(1)? If ls, then you may be running > into the page rounding of the .text and .data sections...
size(1), ls(1)-before-strip(1), and ls(1)-after-strip(1). -- Colin Percival Security Officer, FreeBSD | freebsd.org | The power to serve Founder / author, Tarsnap | tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
