>> This looks wrong.  While X11BASE is certainly dead, LOCALBASE is not, so the
>> existing code should have been changed, but not removed.

Does this look good?
Build tested only.

commit 271b766fdbd907be040767f2387b4d5fbb6425f7
Author: Eitan Adler <li...@eitanadler.com>
Date:   Mon Mar 19 11:52:31 2012 -0400

    Restore the ability to use a non-standard LOCALBASE

    Submitted by:       jhb
    Approved by:        cperciva
    MFC after:  0 days (with r233136)

diff --git a/secure/usr.sbin/sshd/Makefile b/secure/usr.sbin/sshd/Makefile
index 0120771..6426ff3 100644
--- a/secure/usr.sbin/sshd/Makefile
+++ b/secure/usr.sbin/sshd/Makefile
@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ DPADD+=        ${LIBGSSAPI_KRB5} ${LIBGSSAPI} ${LIBKRB5} 
${LIBASN1}
 LDADD+=         -lgssapi_krb5 -lgssapi -lkrb5 -lasn1
 .endif

+LOCALBASE?= /usr/local
+CFLAGS+= -DXAUTH_PATH=\"${LOCALBASE}/bin/xauth\"
+
 DPADD+=        ${LIBCRYPTO} ${LIBCRYPT}
 LDADD+=        -lcrypto -lcrypt



-- 
Eitan Adler
Source & Ports committer
X11, Bugbusting teams
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to