On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:51:26AM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:14:33PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:58:56PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:35:23AM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > ... > > > > > > > ?3. The two changes above unfortunately require an API change, so > > > > > > > while > > > > > > > ? ? at it add a version field and some spares to the ioctl() > > > > > > > argument > > > > > > > ? ? to help detect mismatches. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is it worth bumping __FreeBSD_version? > > > > > > > > > > I don't think it is necessary. > > > > > There is basically no code that uses the netmap API except for > > > > > the examples in tools/tools/netmap, and i now have a NETMAP_API macro > > > > > > > > no code in *FreeBSD base system*, yes? > > > > because I am write tools uses the netmap API now. > > > > > > i am glad to hear that, and the NETMAP_API will serve you well > > > because you can use the same also on the Linux version of netmap > > > > Can you explain some detail about netmap? > > > > 1. What is order of send packets from different rings? > > 2. What is time packets sent? I am need sustain desired value of > > transfer rate. > > Same as with the standard API: > > 1. it is the hardware that decides that. You can make no assumptions. > 2. once again, once you have issued the system call, > it is the hardware that decides when it will send packets out.
Realy? I don't do any system call now and see transmited packets (in dev.ix.0.mac_stats.tx_frames_XXX stats). 3. Jumbo frames support only throw tunable hw.netmap.buf_size? _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
