On Thursday 23 February 2012 06:24 pm, Doug Barton wrote: > According to the logs you didn't make any changes to this file in > 2011, so that would be properly written as: 2009-2010, 2012
I made few local changes in 2011 but forgot to commit. ;-) Besides, I remember there were some discussions in developers@ that "2009-2012" is more appropriate than "2009, 2010, 2012" or "2009-2010, 2012", if my memory serves. Anyone? Jung-uk Kim _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
