Andreas Tobler <andre...@freebsd.org> wrote in <4f1f94b3.6020...@freebsd.org>:
an> On 25.01.12 01:40, Hiroki Sato wrote: an> > Andreas Tobler<andre...@freebsd.org> wrote an> > in<4f1f3585.8060...@freebsd.org>: an> > an> > an> Hi Eitan, an> > an> an> > an> On 20.01.12 02:38, Eitan Adler wrote: an> > an> > Author: eadler an> > an> > Date: Fri Jan 20 01:38:21 2012 an> > an> > New Revision: 230353 an> > an> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/230353 an> > an> > an> > an> > Log: an> > an> > Fix warning when compiling with gcc46: an> > an> > error: variable 'temp' set but not used an> > an> > an> > an> > Approved by: dim an> > an> > Approved by: cperciva (mentor, blanket for pre-mentorship an> > an> > already-approved commits) an> > an> > MFC after: 3 days an> > an> an> > an> I do not know which of the makefs commits it was: an> > an> an> > an> [andreast@neon] /export/home/andreast/> makefs -t cd9660 -o an> > chrp-boot an> > an> -o rockridge -o label=pseries -B4321 p.iso an> > /data1/netboot/powerpc64/ an> > an> Segmentation fault (core dumped) an> > an> an> > an> [neon:~] andreast% uname -ra an> > an> FreeBSD neon.andreas.nets 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #11 an> > an> r230469M: Mon Jan 23 02:53:05 CET 2012 an> > an> an> > andre...@neon.andreas.nets:/usr/obj/export/devel/fbsd/head/src/sys/NEON an> > an> amd64 an> > an> an> > an> Reverting to 230352 lets me create an iso. an> > an> an> > an> I compile makefs with the base compiler. an> > an> an> > an> I'll do some more investigations tomorrow, late night here. an> > an> > I got the same symptom and am investigating it. Can you rebuild the an> > binary with a debug option like this: an> > an> > % cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/makefs an> > % make clean an> > % make DEBUG_FLAGS=-g an> > % make DEBUG_FLAGS=-g install an> > an> > and then send me the output of the following command? an> > an> > % printf "run -t cd9660 -o chrp-boot -o rockridge -o label=pseries an> > % -B4321 p.iso /data1/netboot/powerpc64/\nbt\nf 1\n f 2\n" | gdb -x an> > % /dev/stdin -batch /usr/sbin/makefs an> > an> > In my environment both the old and the new version could reproduce an> > it. I am not sure if mine is the same as yours at this moment, an> > though. an> an> It is actually r230354, this is the commit which shows the failure. an> And I reverted back to 230353 and onfirmed that it 'works'. Thank you! I will investigating it. Actually my test data set can make SIGSEGV in both of the versions for some reason. I have to narrow down the cause, anyway. I guess your /data1/netboot/powerpc64/ is quite large, but can I receive the tarball of it in some way? It would be helpful. -- Hiroki
pgplNpOsrjM4u.pgp
Description: PGP signature
