On Fri, Jan 20, 2012, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-01-20 08:55, Roman Divacky wrote: > >http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11406 says this has been > >fixed, is this just problem with us having older clang in base? > > Obviously, it has only been fixed in llvm trunk. If this is a pressing > problem, we can backport the fix. Otherwise, it will be fixed when we > import a more recent snapshot.
It isn't a pressing issue. The test was failing due to an even more basic bug than the one I was trying to test; adding two constants was producing the wrong answer. Therefore, I can't confirm that the test now passes, but they did fix *a* bug. By the way, having dealt with gcc bugs in the past, I found reporting a clang bug to be an unexpectedly pleasant experience. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
