Sorry for the delay. On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 20:50:16 +0100, Harti Brandt wrote: > On Fri, 30 Dec 2011, Ben Kaduk wrote: > >On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Ulrich Spoerlein <u...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> Modified: head/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_wlan/BEGEMOT-WIRELESS-MIB.txt > >> ============================================================================== > >> --- head/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_wlan/BEGEMOT-WIRELESS-MIB.txt > >> Fri Dec 30 10:45:00 2011 (r228989) > >> +++ head/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_wlan/BEGEMOT-WIRELESS-MIB.txt > >> Fri Dec 30 10:58:14 2011 (r228990) > >> @@ -82,8 +82,8 @@ WlanMgmtReasonCode ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTIO > >> associationLeave(8), > >> associationNotAuthenticated(9), > >> -- XXX: TODO - FIXME > >> - dissasocPwrcapBad(10), > >> - dissasocSuperchanBad(11), > >> + disassocPwrcapBad(10), > >> + disassocSuperchanBad(11), > > > >This file looks like it might be intended to be machine-readable -- I > >would worry about changing it without test/review. > >Perhaps this spelling "error" is even the reason for the XXX comment above. > > Absolutely. If there is a spelling error in an SNMP MIB outside comments > or description strings it must stay there. Otherwise applications reading > that file will break. > > This is also true for the corresponding .def file. > > harti
Neither Google, Bing nor Google Code Search can find any occurrence of any of the two words in either spelling, except in our tree, of course. This leads me to believe that at least no known Open Source project will be affected by the change. But that doesn't say much. Is this a non-backwards compatible change that we can do when going from 9.x to 10.0? I'm fine with backing it out, too, if you think this will actually break anything for third parties. Just say the word. Thanks Uli _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
