Author: marius
Date: Sun Dec 18 17:48:54 2011
New Revision: 228694
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/228694

Log:
  Fix compilation on sparc64 by actually supplying the bus_dma_tag_t member
  of the rx_ring to bus_dmamap_sync(9). Given that netmap code tries to
  obtain the bus addresses of netmap buffers via vtophys(9) instead of using
  bus_dma(9) it currently has zero chance of actually working on sparc64
  though (and for that matter f.e. also not with MACs limited to 32-bit DMA
  on x86 machines with more than 4GB of RAM).

Modified:
  head/sys/dev/netmap/if_em_netmap.h

Modified: head/sys/dev/netmap/if_em_netmap.h
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/dev/netmap/if_em_netmap.h  Sun Dec 18 17:42:26 2011        
(r228693)
+++ head/sys/dev/netmap/if_em_netmap.h  Sun Dec 18 17:48:54 2011        
(r228694)
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ em_netmap_rxsync(void *a, u_int ring_nr,
                if ((curr->status & E1000_RXD_STAT_DD) == 0)
                        break;
                ring->slot[j].len = le16toh(curr->length);
-               bus_dmamap_sync(rxr->tag, rxr->rx_buffers[l].map,
+               bus_dmamap_sync(rxr->rxtag, rxr->rx_buffers[l].map,
                        BUS_DMASYNC_POSTREAD);
                j = (j == lim) ? 0 : j + 1;
                /* make sure next_to_refresh follows next_to_check */
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to