* David Chisnall <thera...@freebsd.org>, 20111207 22:17: > As per das@'s suggestion, s/__noreturn/_Noreturn/, since the latter is an > identifier reserved for the implementation in C99 and earlier so there is > no sensible reason for introducing yet another reserved identifier when we > could just use the one C1x uses.
So this is the same as __dead2, right? Maybe we should do a sweep of the tree and replace all __dead2's by _Noreturn? -- Ed Schouten <e...@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgp4aakqdFdqD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
