Dag-Erling Smørgrav <d...@des.no> writes: > Jilles Tjoelker <jil...@stack.nl> writes: > > Although this will work, I think it trades the quality of the binaries > > for a cleaner build system. It is better to pass all libraries to ld(1) > > even though a .so may have unresolved references: the NEEDED entry > > serves as an additional protection against version mismatches and symbol > > versioning (if you ever add it) requires ld(1) to have access to the .so > > containing the definition so it knows the version name to store in the > > output file. > These are plugins. The names and prototypes of the functions they > export were set in stone 15 years ago.
Sorry, that was a bit unclear. What I was trying to say is that symbol versioning is not and will never be an issue. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
