In article <1321457050.78238.10.ca...@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu>
Ken Smith <kensm...@buffalo.edu> writes:
>> >> +: ${RELSTRING=`chroot $2 uname -s`-`chroot $2 uname -r`-`chroot $2 uname
>> >> -p`}
>> > Should this be 'uname -m' rather than 'uname -p'?
>>
>> There isn't a good option here when there is only one tag -- most of the
>> time, I imagine this will get specified in the builder's environment. I
>> picked uname -p because there are more possibilities than uname -m: it
>> breaks the degeneracies for PPC, ARM, and MIPS, leaving only one for
>> i386/pc98. uname -m would have been the other way around.
I see.
> Or both? We're heading in the direction of having both for the FTP
> server tree.
>
> Kinda gross but "FBSD-9.0-RELEASE-amd64-amd64-bootonly.iso"? I don't
> see a good option among the three possibilities, which are:
>
> 1) uname -m only
> 2) uname -p only
> 3) both
>
> Option 3 at least has the benefit of not being abiguous and covers all
> the possibilities for builds given the new infrastructure.
I think that the same scheme as the FTP site is better. So I choose
(3) option.
---
TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro <n...@freebsd.org>
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
