On 5. Oct 2011, at 16:27 , Qing Li wrote:
> Author: qingli
> Date: Wed Oct 5 16:27:11 2011
> New Revision: 226040
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/226040
>
> Log:
> The IFA_RTSELF instead of the IFA_ROUTE flag should be checked to
> determine if a loopback route should be installed for an interface
> IPv6 address. Another condition is the address must not belong to a
> looopback interface.
If I set useloopback to 0 my loopback will no longer have a route to itself
anymore now?
>
> Reviewed by: hrs
> MFC after: 3 days
>
> Modified:
> head/sys/netinet6/in6.c
>
> Modified: head/sys/netinet6/in6.c
> ==============================================================================
> --- head/sys/netinet6/in6.c Wed Oct 5 16:03:47 2011 (r226039)
> +++ head/sys/netinet6/in6.c Wed Oct 5 16:27:11 2011 (r226040)
> @@ -1810,9 +1810,9 @@ in6_ifinit(struct ifnet *ifp, struct in6
> /*
> * add a loopback route to self
> */
> - if (!(ia->ia_flags & IFA_ROUTE)
> + if (!(ia->ia_flags & IFA_RTSELF)
> && (V_nd6_useloopback
> - || (ifp->if_flags & IFF_LOOPBACK))) {
> + && !(ifp->if_flags & IFF_LOOPBACK))) {
> error = ifa_add_loopback_route((struct ifaddr *)ia,
> (struct sockaddr *)&ia->ia_addr);
> if (error == 0)
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
