Hi Joel, Joel Dahl <j...@freebsd.org> wrote in <201107302309.p6un9rhj019...@svn.freebsd.org>:
jo> Author: joel (doc committer) jo> Date: Sat Jul 30 23:09:52 2011 jo> New Revision: 224533 jo> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/224533 jo> jo> Log: jo> Add a better description, a few examples and a couple of minor fixes. jo> jo> Reviewed by: brueffer jo> Approved by: re (kib) jo> jo> Modified: jo> head/share/man/man4/pcm.4 jo> jo> Modified: head/share/man/man4/pcm.4 jo> ============================================================================== (snip) jo> @@ -173,7 +244,7 @@ controls (bass and treble). jo> Commonly used for ear-candy or frequency compensation due to the vast jo> difference in hardware quality. jo> EQ is disabled by default, but can be enabled with the jo> -.Va hint.pcm. Ns Ao Ar X Ac Ns Va .eq jo> +.Va hint.pcm.%d.eq : jo> -.It Va hint.pcm. Ns Ao Ar X Ac Ns Va .eq jo> +.It Va hint.pcm.%d.eq : jo> -.It Va hint.pcm. Ns Ao Ar X Ac Ns Va .vpc jo> +.It Va hint.pcm.%d.vpc I know several manual pages are also using this expression (%d) for replaceables, but I am wondering if this is friendly for average users. Is ".Ar N" for an integer problematic, for example? I would like comments since other documents in DocBook have used such a notation for a long time and I feel we need consistency with them. -- Hiroki
pgpHvfkTcpuoF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
