On May 17, 2011, at 7:44 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 01:36:11PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <20110516211954.gj48...@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>, Kostik >> Belousov >> writes: >> >>> struct sbuf is exposed to the libsubf.so consumers. >>> I think that libsbuf.so version shall be bumped (since no symver >>> compat can be provided, due to lack of versioning for libsbuf). >>> >>> The bump was also needed after the r212367. Lets do one for two changes. >> >> Ok, I'm done, >> >> Question: Do we bumb the libsbuf version, or do we start using >> symbol-versioning, and if so, how is that done ? > > We do bump the libsbuf version, regardless of the symbol versioning. > If symver is introduced, then it can be combined with the bump. > > Please see http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/symver/freebsd_versioning.txt > for the document describing the rules. > > The exemplary use of the versioning for newly introduced library is > r221931.
Also, there's a strong encouragement to go to symbol versioning as that makes our lives much easier going forward. Warner _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
