I think the problem is that user.* is somehow magically namespaced, so doing a "dumb" sysctlbyname will get the wrong one.
sysctl (the tool) does: __sysctl("sysctl.name2oid user.localbase",2,0xfffffbfffde98,0xfffffbfffda98,0x810809000,14) = 0 (0x0) __sysctl("sysctl.oidfmt user.localbase",4,0xfffffbfffdef8,0xfffffbfffd690,0x0,0) = 0 (0x0) __sysctl("sysctl.name { 8.21 }",4,0xfffffbfffc8f8,0xfffffbfffc480,0x0,0) = 0 (0x0) __sysctl("sysctl.oidfmt user.localbase",4,0xfffffbfffd0f8,0xfffffbfffc488,0x0,0) = 0 (0x0) __sysctl("user.localbase",2,0x0,0xfffffbfffc480,0x0,0) = 0 (0x0) __sysctl("user.localbase",2,0x81080a000,0xfffffbfffd0f8,0x0,0) = 0 (0x0) and picks up /usr/local. whereas libutil is currently just doing __sysctlbyname("user.localbase",14,0xfffffbfffd4f8,0xfffffbfffd440,0x0,0) = 0 (0x0) which is returning the builtin "" from the static kernel variable. On Sun, Nov 15, 2020, at 1:26 PM, Jessica Clarke wrote: > On 15 Nov 2020, at 19:10, Brandon Bergren <bdra...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > On powerpc64 and powerpc64le, there is some really weird behavior happening > > around the sysctl itself: > > > > root@crow:~ # pkg > > The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. > > Do you want to fetch and install it now? [y/N]: N > > root@crow:~ # sysctl user.localbase > > user.localbase: /usr/local > > root@crow:~ # pkg > > The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. > > Do you want to fetch and install it now? [y/N]: N > > root@crow:~ # sysctl user.localbase=/usr/local > > user.localbase: /usr/local -> /usr/local > > root@crow:~ # pkg > > pkg: not enough arguments > > Usage: pkg [-v] [-d] [-l] [-N] [-j <jail name or id>|-c <chroot path>|-r > > <rootdir>] [-C <configuration file>] [-R <repo config dir>] [-o var=value] > > [-4|-6] <command> [<args>] > > > > For more information on available commands and options see 'pkg help'. > > root@crow:~ # > > > > > > I would double check very closely that the sysctl is being called > > correctly, the sysctl tool manages to read it out, but libutil does not. > > That's odd. What does truss say? > > Jess > > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2020, at 1:06 PM, Scott Long wrote: > >> > >>> On Nov 15, 2020, at 12:01 PM, Jessica Clarke <jrt...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I felt similar concerns, but my misunderstanding of strlcpy() drove the > >>>> result. Since the use case for getlocalbase() lends itself to also use > >>>> strlcat()/strlcpy(), I was trying to replicate the API semantics of > >>>> those, > >>>> at least to the limit of my understanding. Thanks for the feedback, I’ll > >>>> look at it some more. > >>> > >>> Thanks. ENOMEM also feels inappropriate as no allocation is taking > >>> place. Perhaps ENAMETOOLONG, which is used in similar cases for things > >>> like gethostbyname? Though sysctlbyname uses ENOMEM instead... sigh. > >>> > >> > >> Yep, I wasn’t happy with ENOMEM either but I couldn’t find anything better. > >> > >>> Also, if pathlen has already been checked against SSIZE_MAX (giving > >>> EINVAL) and tmplen against pathlen there's no need to then check tmplen > >>> against SSIZE_MAX. > >>> > >> > >> Done. > >> > >>> I'd be happy to give a review on Phabricator if/when you have a new > >>> patch. > >>> > >> > >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27227 > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Scott > >> > >> > > > > -- > > Brandon Bergren > > bdra...@freebsd.org > > -- Brandon Bergren bdra...@freebsd.org _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"