On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 10:05 AM John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 6/1/20 8:02 AM, Kyle Evans wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 1:18 AM Hartmann, O. <ohartm...@walstatt.org> wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, 31 May 2020 11:43:18 +0200 > >> "Hartmann, O." <ohartm...@walstatt.org> wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, 29 May 2020 19:22:40 +0000 (UTC) > >>> John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Author: jhb > >>>> Date: Fri May 29 19:22:40 2020 > >>>> New Revision: 361633 > >>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/361633 > >>>> > >>>> Log: > >>>> Consistently include opt_ipsec.h for consumers of > >>>> <netipsec/ipsec.h>. > >>>> This fixes ipsec.ko to include all of IPSEC_DEBUG. > >>>> > >>> [... snip ...] > >>> > >>> [...] > >>> --- all_subdir_ipsec --- > >>> --- ipsec_mod.o --- > >>> /usr/src/sys/netipsec/ipsec_mod.c:114:3: error: implicit declaration > >>> of function 'ipsec_support_enable' is invalid in C99 > >>> [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > >>> ipsec_support_enable(ipv4_ipsec_support, &ipv4_methods); ^ > >>> /usr/src/sys/netipsec/ipsec_mod.c:125:3: error: implicit declaration > >>> of function 'ipsec_support_disable' is invalid in C99 > >>> [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > >>> ipsec_support_disable(ipv4_ipsec_support); ^ --- all_subdir_ipwfw --- > >>> Building > >>> /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/WALHALL/modules/usr/src/sys/modules/ipwfw/ipw_bss/ipw_bss.ko > >>> --- all_subdir_ipsec --- /usr/src/sys/netipsec/ipsec_mod.c:125:3: > >>> note: did you mean 'ipsec_support_enable'? > >>> /usr/src/sys/netipsec/ipsec_mod.c:114:3: note: 'ipsec_support_enable' > >>> declared here ipsec_support_enable(ipv4_ipsec_support, &ipv4_methods); > >>> ^ 2 errors generated. *** [ipsec_mod.o] Error code 1 > >>> > >>> make[4]: stopped in /usr/src/sys/modules/ipsec > >> > >> FYI: IPSEC is statically built into the kernel via "options IPSEC" > > > > This is the same failure as we're seeing on LINT kernels, which also > > have both. I've got a tentative diff at [0] that teaches the modules > > to cope with the possibility, but I haven't thought too much on how > > useful the result is. IIRC we're building the modules into the kernel > > anyways in this scenario, so the result probably just won't load > > because it's already loaded. > > > > [0] https://people.freebsd.org/~kevans.ipsec.diff > > I think we should just not build ipsec.ko and tcp_md5.ko if the kernel already > includes the support instead. I started testing this yesterday but got side > tracked. I will try to get this fixed today. >
Hi, Sorry, I forgot to follow up- I went ahead and tested+committed that as r361712 to end the Jenkins spam. Thanks, Kyle Evans _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
