On 2020-01-15 07:10, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
I really want to reverse the argument order of epoch_call() as well.
The current order is really backwards:
void
epoch_call(epoch_t epoch, epoch_context_t ctx,
void (*callback)(epoch_context_t));
Suggested declaration is:
void
epoch_call(epoch_t epoch, epoch_context_t ctx,
void (*callback)(epoch_context_t));
Hi,
I think he meant to put the ctx argument last. Look at how the function
is implemented to see if that makes any sense, I.E. how arguments are
optimised.
> epoch_call(epoch_t epoch, epoch_context_t ctx,
> void (*callback)(epoch_context_t));
Is this *want* just because of "function, argument" is better than
"argument, function" ?
--HPS
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
