On 1/3/20 8:39 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > >> Author: jhb >> Date: Sat Jan 4 00:59:47 2020 >> New Revision: 356344 >> URL: >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/356344 >> . . . >> +MAKE_PARAMS_powerpc?= CROSS_TOOLCHAIN=powerpc64-gcc6 >> . . . >> +TOOLCHAINS_powerpc= powerpc64-gcc6 >> . . . > > (I know that for now gcc9 is not in use but > I'm looking at the overall pattern going > forward vs. what is expected to work shorter > term, even if not yet fully.) > > Given the likes of: > > TARGET=powerpc TARGET_ARCH=powerpc > TARGET=powerpc TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64 > > Is this going to change at some point to use > powerpc-gcc9 and powerpc64-gcc9 (and the matching > devel/binutils@powerpc and devel/binutils@powerpc64 > related commands), picking the matching commands? > (More TARGET_ARCH based?) > > Until then, is it really restricted to powerpc64 > because of the toolchain used (and lack of various > command parameters to possibly control all the > required behavioral differences for targeting > 32-bit powerpc)? > > (powerpcspe has been dropped from gcc, if I > understand right. So I do not expect that it > can be covered. So I did not list it as another > TARGET_ARCH value above.)
For powerpc, I'm about to switch it to just using clang. riscv is now almost ready for clang as well (I have one hack I need to do to the kernel so lld can link it after dim@'s merges yesterday). I probably will add some kind of WITH_GCC=yes to 'make tinderbox' I think, but that will require untangling the mess so it can pick per-machine_arch toolchains rather than per-cpuarch. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
