I’m not opposed to the idea, but making any change invites a bike shed on naming, and making no change at all invites a bike shed on naming, and honestly the name doesn’t matter to me at this point. I encourage you and Ed to own this.
Scott > On Dec 6, 2019, at 6:58 AM, Eric van Gyzen <e...@vangyzen.net> wrote: > > > >> On Dec 6, 2019, at 4:36 AM, Ed Maste <ema...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 21:43, Scott Long <sco...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> >>> Author: scottl >>> Date: Fri Dec 6 02:43:05 2019 >>> New Revision: 355436 >>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/355436 >>> >>> Log: >>> Move the mds, irbs, and ssb mitigation knobs into machdep.mitigations. >> >> If we're moving them and adding backwards-compatibility scaffolding we >> really should correct the sense of the sysctls at the same time. > > I was just going to suggest that. For some, 0 is secure; for others, 1 is > secure. Since they’re under “mitigations,” I think 1 should consistently > mean “mitigated.” > > Eric _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
