23.08.2019 10:01, Conrad Meyer wrote: > Should this be done more generally? Last time I looked it seemed like > libxo was completely locale-unaware and just assumed all input was > UTF-8. It might make more sense to have libxo take locale into > account when formatting %s strings.
libxo is locale-aware but in its own quite peculiar way, as libxo(3) tells: > For strings, the 'h' and 'l' modifiers affect the interpretation of the > bytes pointed to argument. The default '%s' string is a 'char *' pointer > to a string encoded as UTF-8. Since UTF-8 is compatible with ASCII data, > a normal 7-bit ASCII string can be used. "%ls" expects a "wchar_t *" > pointer to a wide-character string, encoded as 32-bit Unicode values. > "%hs" expects a "char *" pointer to a multi-byte string encoded with the > current locale, as given by the LC_CTYPE, LANG, or LC_ALL environment > variables. I'd like it detect UTF-8 automatically instead with strcmp(nl_langinfo(CODESET), "UTF-8") but I'm not going to hack libxo code myself as I'm not familiar with its design. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
