On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 12:52 PM Ed Maste <ema...@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 13:25, Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> >
> > would using 'removed from the tree' be better here? Because that's the
> current plan of record.
>
> I originally had "removed" but then noticed your mail had 05-31 as the
> date for "svn rm all non-clang platforms not supported by in-tree LLVM
> or converted to ext toolchain". I didn't want to overwhelm with dates
> that might change.  Maybe something like "may be removed from the tree
> after that date"?
>

That works. I want the threat of removal to be there, though honestly I
don't think it will matter. nobody is going to step up and do it.

Warner
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to