On 7/10/19 9:48 PM, Randall Stewart wrote: > John: > > Thanks for the suggestions.. I have committed changes to the two > nits. As to M_PROTO1, I see that in the NF world we have removed > M_PROTO12 and moved the M_PROTO’s up 1 i.e. M_PROTO1 == 0x2000 > > So for now it is safe, since the M_TSTMP_LRO is not yet used.. but in > my up and coming commits I will have to address this i.e. either do > the same thing or just make it use M_PROTO12. > > There are a couple of places M_PROTO1 is used on the receive path > so that would not work there :o > > After I get the DSACK fixes in my next change to get BBR in will > be the LRO work… > > So maybe I should just settle on using M_PROTO12 for that > what do you think?
If M_PROTO12 isn't used in the tree, then the approach we've used in the past is to bump up the M_PROTO<n> values by one as in the NF tree. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
