niedz., 6 sty 2019 o 16:50 Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@cschubert.com> napisał(a): > > In message <201901061623.x06gns1w057...@repo.freebsd.org>, Edward > Tomasz Napier > ala writes: > > Author: trasz > > Date: Sun Jan 6 16:23:28 2019 > > New Revision: 342812 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/342812 > > > > Log: > > Give sh(1) a proper default prompt instead of just "$". > > > > Reviewed by: jilles > > MFC after: 2 weeks > > Relnotes: totally > > Sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18697 > > > > Modified: > > head/share/skel/dot.shrc > > > > Modified: head/share/skel/dot.shrc > > ============================================================================= > > = > > --- head/share/skel/dot.shrc Sun Jan 6 05:07:52 2019 (r342811) > > +++ head/share/skel/dot.shrc Sun Jan 6 16:23:28 2019 (r342812) > > @@ -32,8 +32,8 @@ alias g='egrep -i' > > # alias rm='rm -i' > > > > > > -# # set prompt: ``username@hostname:directory $ '' > > -# PS1="`whoami`@\h:\w \\$ " > > +# set prompt: ``username@hostname:directory $ '' > > +PS1="`whoami`@\h:\w \\$ " > > > > # search path for cd(1) > > # CDPATH=:$HOME > > > > Hmmm. At $JOB the RHEL servers use this prompt. IMO the prompt is > unwieldy and distracting. Instead of \w could we use \W instead?
The whole point of this change is to make things a little less weird for newcomers; existing users either use one of the shells from ports, or just carry their own shell rc file with their preferred PS1; either way they probably won't even notice. That's why I chose to follow the _actual_ status quo, both in FreeBSD (the new prompt is the same as the csh(1) one, apart from the '$') and Linux. Thus the '\w'. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
