On Tuesday, February 15, 2011 4:18:41 pm Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Roman Divacky <rdiva...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > I put there u_int8_t for a reason. That reason being that > > it's basically struct direct->d_type which is u_int8_t > > and not uint8_t. > > Even though they're technically the same typedef'ed type (I'd keep > style consistent according to the argument rdivacky is making). I > guess this has about the same bikeshed-ability as my proposal to > change all of the *chflags syscalls to use fflags_t instead of > u_long/int/etc on freebsd-fs did a few weeks back.
No, this is different. The uint8_t is correct. C99 adopted uint*_t making u_int*_t deprecated. In general all new code should use the C99 types. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
