On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 20:29:27 -0700 Conrad Meyer <c...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 5:46 PM Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 11:46:23PM +0000, Conrad Meyer wrote: > > > ... > > > @@ -232,7 +232,15 @@ points outside the process's allocated address space. > > > A signal was delivered before the time limit expired and > > > before any of the selected events occurred. > > > .It Bq Er EINVAL > > > -The specified time limit is invalid. One of its components is negative > > > or too large. > > > +The specified time limit is invalid. > > > +One of its components is negative or too large. > > > +.It Bq Er EINVAL > > > +The number of pollfd structures specified by > > > +.Fa nfds > > > +exceeds the system tunable > > > +.Va kern.maxfilesperproc > > > +and > > > +.Dv FD_SETSIZE . > > > > This is somewhat confusing. Looking only at the man page text, most > > straight reading of it is that nfds cannot exceed min(maxfilesperproc, > > FD_SETSIZE). But in fact nfds cannot exceed max of it, which is > > significantly different, i.e. poll(2) does not suffer from the (userspace) > > FD_SETSIZE limitation of select(2). > > min(maxfilesperproc, FD_SETSIZE) would be written as "nfds exceeds ... > maxfilesperproc OR FD_SETSIZE," rather than "and." I think the > sentence is unambiguous. > Based on Konstantin's comment I'd have to say that it is not unambiguous. As a native English speaker I had to read it several times to understand it. I think something like "exceeds both" might be clearer. -- Gary Jennejohn _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
