Without looking at the unbound source, I assume they want the semantics of what we call SO_REUSEPORT_LB in FreeBSD >= 12.0. See setsockopt(2) for a brief description.
Whether it makes sense to conditionalize that or simply disable the sockopt I have no opinion on just sharing the above knowledge. Regards, On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:26 PM Dag-Erling Smørgrav <d...@des.no> wrote: > > Harry Schmalzbauer <free...@omnilan.de> writes: > > Most likely you are aware about the "so-reuseport" topic via Unbound-users. > > I didn't follow the diff/issue at all, just wanted to point it out, so > > somebody from the experts team can decide if 1.8.1 is suitable (with > > the 1.8.1 defaults) for shipping... > > I'll apply the upstream patch (r4932) before the release. Right now I > need to focus on DNS-over-TLS support. > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no > _______________________________________________ > svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
