On 5 Aug 2018, at 4:02, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Also, I don't know the hash used, but another option is to use a
non-power of 2 hash...

I remember seeing patches someone experimented with a new hash algorithm, but I can’t seem to find it anywhere right now. I believe the patch was abandoned, perhaps because of disappointing results.

Increasing the memory required on smaller systems and not making sure
it's documented how to save that memory is a bad idea...

The relevant tuneables are documented in the pf(4) man page.

Regards,
Kristof
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to