On 1/5/11 11:39 AM, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 11:17:20 am Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
On 2011-01-04, John Baldwin wrote:
Err, no, the point of NOTREACHED is to serve as documentation for
lint(1), but
that has subsequently been obsoleted by __dead2.
style(9) is out of date then?
According to bde@'s most recent e-mails, yes.
It's obviously out of date, since its only example of using
NOTREACHED is after a usage() call, and this usage is missing a
__dead2. Of course it
doesn't use NOTREACHED after its 3 exit() calls or its 2 err() calls or
its 1 errx() call, so its "should" requirement for using NOTREACHED is
mostly not satisfied by itself.
However I feel that teh notreached comment is as much for the reader
as the compiler/lint.
Removing it makes the code harder to understand for the feeble minded
such as myself.
Bruce
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
